The Possibilities of Using the Encyclopedia in Introducing Modern Students to the Culture of Academic Writing

Abstract

The article considers the possibility of using a modern electronic encyclopedia in the educational process. It is noted that both teachers and students themselves significantly underestimate the possibilities of tertiary electronic sources, which include digital encyclopedias. The author emphasizes that in the electronic encyclopedia format, the traditional disadvantages of printed tertiary sources and of electronic databases are significantly leveled, while the advantages of both of them are preserved in full. It is noted that modern electronic encyclopedias meet the features of information expectations and attitudes to the educational process that are typical for younger generations today, and can also act as guiding sources for students with a proven basis and rigid structure. Using them in the educational process will contribute to the formation of students' research skills and gradually "force" them to academic work and greatly facilitate the development of academic writing. Turning to electronic tertiary sources as a modern and convenient tool will help in solving such problems of students existing in modern education as the crisis of textual culture, reducing the time of active attention and the erosion of stable motivation. For the most effective use of the electronic encyclopedia as an educational tool and at the same time the gradual formation of analytical reading and academic writing skills, it is recommended to introduce special educational disciplines that act as a kind of educational lot for the development of tertiary electronic sources, acting, in turn, as a lot in the world of science.

Author Biography

Daria Pavlovna Kozolupenko, Lomonosov Moscow State University

Professor of the Department of Philosophy of Education, Faculty of Philosophy, Dr. Sci. (Philos.)

References

1. Karpov A.O. Fundamental models of education of the future. Voprosy Filosofii. 2022(1):54-64. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-1-54-64
2. Karpov A.O. Generative Educational Environment: Constructional and Creative Models. Pedagogika. 2018;(9):3-11. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: YAEXYD
3. Karpov A.O. Innovations and the Research Education Environment. Philosophy of Education. 2013;4:27-37. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: RAUTIF
4. Karpov A.O. Knowledge that Can Generate New Knowledge: from the Perspective of Science and Education. Voprosy Filosofii. 2020;(5):103-115. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2020-5-103-115
5. Perez J., Murray M.C. Generativity: The New Frontier for Information and Communication Technology Literacy. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management. 2010;5:127-137. https://doi.org/10.28945/1134
6. Bogoyavlenskaya D.B. On the nature of research activity. Researcher. 2020(4):29-39. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: ZHYYPP
7. Radaev V.V. Crisis in the Modern University Teaching: What went wrong? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Studies. 2022;(6):114-124. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250019853-1
8. Rozova O.A. A Reading Crisis. In Situ. 2022;(12):197-199. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: WXKMAL
9. Indrikov A.A., Poelueva L.A., Indrikova A.A. Metalanguage of "Ascending Evolution": Reflection on the Monumental Foundations of Culture. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2023;(1):146-159. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) http://dx.doi.org/10.17805/zpu.2023.1.10
10. Lebedeva M.Yu., Veselovskaya T.S., Kupreschenko O.F. Features of perception and understanding of digital texts: an interdisciplinary view. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovania = Perspectives of Science and Education. 2020;46(4):74-98. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2020.4.5
11. Perlov A. "What Do We Want and How Do We Explain It": Transh Formations of the Tutorial on Preparing a Research Project. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2011;(7):133-140. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: NYJJIB
12. Krysov V.V. Didactical Microunits for Designing Research Competence. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2011;(8-9):120-123. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: OFAQAJ
13. Korotkina I.B. The Story of Writing: From Classical Rhetoric to Rhetoric and Composition. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2021;30(12):75-86. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-12-75-86
14. Hyland K. Teaching and Researching Writing. New York and London: Routledge; 2015. 328 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717203
15. Smetannikova N.N. Chtenie s lista i s ehkrana [Reading from a sheet and from a screen]. Higher Education Today. 2012;(1):42-48. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: PJJKKV
16. Gilmanova A.A., Khakimzyanova D.F. Specifics of Text Perception in Digital Reading. Russian Linguistic Bulletin. 2024. 4(52). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.18454/RULB.2024.52.6
17. Ackerman R., Goldsmith M. Metacognitive regulation of text learning: On screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 2011;17(1):18-32. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022086
18. Askwall S. Computer-supported reading vs. reading text on paper: A comparison of two reading situations. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 1985;22(4):425-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(85)80048-1
19. Coiro J., Dobler E. Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading research quarterly. 2007;42(2):214-257. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.42.2.2
20. Delgado P., Vargas C., Ackerman R., Salmerón L. Don t Throw Away Your Printed Books: A Meta-analysis on the Effects of Reading Media on Reading Comprehension. Educational Research Review. 2018;25:23-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
21. Green T.D., Perera R.A., Dance L.A., Myers E.A. Impact of Presentation Mode on Recall of Written Text and Numerical Information: Hard Copy Versus Electronic. North American Journal of Psychology. 2010;12(2):233-242.
22. Muter P., Maurutto P. Reading and skimming from computer screens and books: the paperless office revisited? Behaviour & Information Technology. 1991;10(4):257-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449299108924288
23. Shestak V.P., Shestak N.V. Research Competence and Academic Writing. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2011;(12):115-119. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: OMTRVL
24. Valladares L. Scientific Literacy and Social Transformation. Science & Education. 2021;30:557-587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00205-2
25. Heuberger R., Leone L.E., Evers R. The challenges of reconstructing cultural heritage: An international digital collaboration. IFLA Journal. 2015;41(3):223-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035215597235
Published
2024-07-28
How to Cite
KOZOLUPENKO, Daria Pavlovna. The Possibilities of Using the Encyclopedia in Introducing Modern Students to the Culture of Academic Writing. Modern Information Technologies and IT-Education, [S.l.], v. 20, n. 2, p. 299-308, july 2024. ISSN 2411-1473. Available at: <http://sitito.cs.msu.ru/index.php/SITITO/article/view/1074>. Date accessed: 11 sep. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.25559/SITITO.020.202402.299-308.