Информационная архитектура для организации взаимодействия с внешними участниками на основе российских информационных стандартов

Yuri Pavlovich Lipuntsov; Oleg Aleksejevich Logachev

doi:10.25559/SITITO.021.202502.364-378

Yuri Pavlovich Lipuntsov Lomonosov Moscow State University http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1690-8956
Oleg Aleksejevich Logachev Lomonosov Moscow State University http://orcid.org/0009-0009-3660-7393

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25559/SITITO.021.202502.364-378

Abstract

Information architecture provides the semantics of interaction between participants of economic activity. With the growth of digitized assets, the role of domain specialists with deep knowledge in informatics is increasing, who are able to generalize domain experience as a reflection of a set of rules, principles, and behavioral dependencies of objects. The work is based on a modular product architecture, which involves organizing interaction with external participants. Information exchange is organized using Russian standards. The paper provides an overview of Russian standards designed to standardize information exchange between different levels of enterprise management: from data capture by physical devices to strategic management decisions based on receiving and processing enterprise information and its environment. Managing an industrial enterprise requires constant attention to optimization, cost-effectiveness, energy efficiency, and reducing time-to-market for new products. Modern methods of working with information allow solving these problems based on data sets reflecting all economic aspects in various dimensions.

Author Biographies

Yuri Pavlovich Lipuntsov, Lomonosov Moscow State University

Head of the Chair of Economic Informatics, Faculty of Economics, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor

Oleg Aleksejevich Logachev, Lomonosov Moscow State University

Associate Professor of the Department of Information Security, Faculty of Computational Mathematics and Cybernetics, Dr. Sci. (Phys.-Math.), Associate Professor

References

1. Weber L., Mayer K. Transaction cost economics and the cognitive perspective: Investigating the sources and governance of interpretive uncertainty. Academy of Management Review. 2014;39(3):344-363. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43699248 (accessed 13.05.2025).
2. Galer G., van der Heijden K. The Learning Organization: How Planners Create Organizational Learning. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. 1992;10(6):5-12. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634509210018702
3. Zenger T.R., Felin T., Bigelow L.S. Theories of the Firm-Market Boundary. The Academy of Management Annals. 2011;5(1):89-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2011.590301
4. Kamis A., Tribler H. Entwicklung und Formulierung einer Strategie. In: Workbook Strategisches Management. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel; 2022. p. 107-144. https://doi.org/10.34156/9783791053912-107
5. Kaur K., Selway M., Stumptner M., Johnston A., Mathew J. Standards-Based Interoperable Digital Twin in Industry 4.0 – A Pilot Demonstration. In: Crespo Márquez A., Gómez Fernández J.F., González-Prida Díaz, V., Amadi-Echendu J. (eds) 16th WCEAM Proceedings. WCEAM 2022. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Cham: Springer; 2023. p. 726-735. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25448-2_68
6. Zhang P., Wu Y., Zhu H. Open ecosystem for future industrial Internet of things (IIoT): Architecture and application. CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems. 2020;6(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.17775/CSEEJPES.2019.01810
7. Kannisto P., Hästbacka D., Marttinen A. Information Exchange Architecture for Collaborative Industrial Ecosystem. Information Systems Frontiers. 2020;22:655-670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-018-9877-0
8. Golfarelli M., Maio D., Rizzi S. Conceptual design of data warehouses from E/R schemes. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Kohala Coast, HI, USA: IEEE Press, 1998. vol. 7. p. 334-343. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1998.649228
9. Drath R., Luder A., Peschke J., Hundt L. AutomationML – the glue for seamless automation engineering. In: 2008 IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation. Hamburg, Germany: IEEE Press; 2008. p. 616-623. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2008.4638461
10. Csalódi R., Süle Z., Jaskó S., Holczinger T., Abonyi J. Industry 4.0-Driven Development of Optimization Algorithms: A Systematic Overview. Complexity. 2021:6621235. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6621235
11. Zhao J., Schamp M., Hoedt S., Aghezzaf E.H., Cottyn J. AutomationML in Industry 4.0 Environment: A Systematic Literature Review. In: Weißgraeber P., Heieck F., Ackermann C. (eds) Advances in Automotive Production Technology – Theory and Application. ARENA2036. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Vieweg; 2021. p. 162-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62962-8_19
12. Schleipen M., Selyansky E., Henssen R., Bischoff T. Multi-level user and role concept for a secure plug-and-work based on OPC UA and AutomationML. In: 2015 IEEE 20th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA). Luxembourg, Luxembourg: IEEE Press; 2015. p. 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2015.7301640
13. Shao G., Latif H., Martin-Villalba C., Denno P. Standards-based integration of advanced process control and optimization. Journal of Industrial Information Integration. 2019;13:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2018.10.001
14. Sabet E., Yazdani B., Kian R., Galanakis K. A strategic and global manufacturing capacity management optimisation model: A Scenario-based multi-stage stochastic programming approach. Omega. 2020;93:102026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.01.004
15. Czvetkó T., Abonyi J. Data sharing in Industry 4.0 – AutomationML, B2MML and International Data Spaces-based solutions. Journal of Industrial Information Integration. 2023;33:100438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2023.100438
16. Jaskó S., Skrop A., Holczinger T., Chován T., Abonyi J. Development of manufacturing execution systems in accordance with Industry 4.0 requirements: A review of standard- and ontology-based methodologies and tools. Computers in Industry. 2020;123:103300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103300
17. Skrzeszewska M., Patalas-Maliszewska J. Assessing the Effectiveness of Using the MES in Manufacturing Enterprises in the Context of Industry 4.0. In: Herrera-Viedma E., Vale Z., Nielsen P., Martin Del Rey A., Casado Vara R. (eds.) Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, 16th International Conference, Special Sessions. DCAI 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Vol. 1004. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 49-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23946-6_6
18. Syreyshchikova N.V., Pimenov D.Yu., Mikolajczyk R., Moldovan L. Automation of Production Activities of an Industrial Enterprise based on the ERP System. Procedia Manufacturing. 2020;46:525-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.03.075
19. Shuvalov A.Y., Nekrasov I.V., Latanov A.A., Semenova E.M. Review of Existing Approaches to Optimizing Process Management in Companies with Complex Structures. The First Economic Journal. 2023;(7):30-37. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) https://doi.org/10.58551/20728115_2023_7_30
20. Zuhaira B., Ahmad N. Business process modeling, implementation, analysis, and management: the case of business process management tools. Business Process Management Journal. 2021;27(1):145-183. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2018-0168
21. Delgado A., Calegari D., Espino C., et al. Predictive process monitoring for collaborative business processes: concepts and application. Discover Analytics. 2025;3:5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44257-025-00031-8
22. Kurnikova M., Egorov D. Conceptual Model of Business Process Management in Front End Engineering and Design. In: Mantulenko V. (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference Engineering Innovations and Sustainable Development. CEISD 2024. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. Vol. 540. Cham: Springer; 2024. p. 188-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67372-6_24
23. Maslevich T.P., Rogoghina N.N. Practical approach to the business process management implementation and the process identification. Mekhanizatsiia stroitel'stva. 2014;(9):58-61. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: SNIHAD
24. Kovnerev M.A. The relationship of the quality of business processes and quality activities of the enterprises. E`konomika i predprinimatel`stvo. 2016;(11-1):255-259. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) EDN: XAHSKB
25. Nekrasov I., Schultz T. A Solid Digital Control and Management Loop for an Energy Producing Enterprise. Rational Enterprise Management. 2021;(2):18-21. Available at: http://remmag.ru/upload_data/files/2021-02/GE-TECHNOLINK.pdf (accessed 13.05.2025). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)