NETWORK ORGANIZATION AND SYSTEMIC PRINCIPLES OF GOVERNANCE IN RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN INNOVATIVE BUSINESS AND THE STATE
Abstract
Network organization and systemic principles of governance in relationships between innovative business and the state are examined on the basis of the innovation clusters formation. The focus is on the formation of innovation clusters and ecosystems as collaborative communities, the transition to cluster governance as a new advanced form of the innovation process organization, as well as government policy to support such a transition, along with government and business relations in this context. If we consider clusters not as objects from of some economic theory, but as a new type of governance organization (i.e., from “organizational point of view”), then this requires a new quality of government, a transition to its modern models. The difference between innovation clusters and ecosystems is shown as the two main forms of the innovation process organization that implement the Cluster Governance model. The analysis of the innovation process organization forms, including cluster ones, is based on the same organizational-theoretical scheme that is used in the typology of models of government: “hierarchies – markets – networks”. The hypothesis is that this scheme can act as a “common denominator” for considering models of public administration, innovative business organization and interaction of business with the state.
References
[2] Maracha V.G., Krasnikova T.S. Relations of the State and Business in the Context of Innovation Clusters Formation in Russia: Typology of Models and Socio-Cultural Factors. Russia and the World: Global Challenges and Strategies for Socio-Cultural Modernization. Moscow, FNRSC RAS, 2017, pp. 497–502. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32403642 (accessed 12.09.2018). (In Russian)
[3] Bevir M. Governance: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012. 152 p.
[4] Bespalov S.V., Maracha V.G. Strategic Cycle of Public Administration in the Context of the Multimodality Principle and the Idea of a “Viable” State. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba = Public Administration. 2017; 19(4):25-31. DOI: 10.22394/2070-8378-2017-19-4-25-31
[5] Smorodinskaya N.V. Network Innovation Ecosystems and their Role in Dynamisation of Economic Growth. Innovation. 2014; 7(189):27-33. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23104054 (accessed 12.09.2018). (In Russian)
[6] Thomson A.M., Perry J.L. Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box. Public Administration Review. 2006; 66(s1):20-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x
[7] Gilsing V. Cluster Governance: How clusters can adapt and renew over time. The DRUID PhD-Conference. Vol. 1. Copenhagen, 2000.
[8] Maracha V. Cluster governance as a moderation form of territorial innovation processes. Management of Large-scale System Development (MLSD'2013): Proceedings of 7th International Conference. Vol. II. Moscow: IPM RAS, 2013, pp. 103-110. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22401888 (accessed 12.09.2018). (In Russian)
[9] Maracha V.G., Krasnikova T.S. The Evolution of Innovation Process Organization Forms: Transfer to Collaboration Networks and “Cluster Governance”. Management of Large-scale System Development (MLSD'2017): Proceedings of 10th International Conference. Vol. II (sections 7–13). Moscow, IPM RAS, 2017, pp. 376-383. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32527799 (accessed 12.09.2018). (In Russian)
[10] Maracha V., Krasnikova T. The evolution of innovation process organization forms: Transfer to collaboration networks and “cluster governance”. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Tenth International Conference Management of Large-Scale System Development (MLSD). Moscow, 2017, pp. 1-3.
DOI: 10.1109/MLSD.2017.8109660
[11] Waters T., Waters D. Bureaucracy. Weber’s Rationalism and Modern Society: New Translations on Politics, Bureaucracy, and Social Stratification. Waters T., Waters D. (Eds.) Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2016, pp. 73-127. DOI: 10.1057/9781137365866_6
[12] Wilson W. The Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly. 1887; 2(2):197-222. DOI: 10.2307/2139277
[13] Jackson M.С. Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2003. 378 p.
[14] Pospelova E.A., Kazakova M.V. Principles of Public Administration Reforms in OECD Countries. Gosudarstvennaia sluzhba = Public Administration. 2014; 6(92):100-104. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22699779 (accessed 12.09.2018). (In Russian)
[15] Pospelova E.A., Kazakova M.V. Obstacles for Implementation of the Principles of New Public Management in Public Administration Systems of Developing Countries. Financial journal. 2015; 1(23):99-110. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23091675 (accessed 12.09.2018). (In Russian)
[16] Bale M., Dale T. Public Sector Reform in New Zealand and its Relevance to Developing Countries. The World Bank Research Observ. 1998; 13(1):103-121. DOI: 10.1093/wbro/13.1.103
[17] Manning N. The Legacy of the New Public Management in Developing Countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2001; 67(2):297-312. DOI: 10.1177/0020852301672009
[18] Gaman-Golutvina O.V. World Experience of Reforming of Public Administration Systems: Comparative Analysis. Ezhegodnik RAPN. Moscow, 2008. (In Russian)
[19] DiIulio J.J. Bring Back the Bureaucrats: Why More Federal Workers Will Lead to Better (and Smaller!) Government (New Threats to Freedom). West Conshohocken, PA, Templeton Press, 2014. 186 p.
[20] Maracha V.G. Ideas of “Inclusive” and “Viable” State in Public Administration Practice. Russia in the context of a new political reality: strategy and development methods. Moscow, Prospekt, 2016, pp. 174-175. (In Russian)
[21] Beer S. Brain of the Firm. Second Edition. New York: John Wile, 1981. 417 p.
[22] Maracha V. Feedback Mechanisms in Public Administration System: VSM application and institutional factors. Caputo F. (ed.) Governing business systems. Theories and challenges for systems thinking in practice. Book of abstracts. 4th Business Systems Laboratory International Symposium. Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, August 24-26, 2016, pp. 25-29. Available at: http://bslab-symposium.net/Vilnius.2016/BSLab-Vilnius2016-e-book_of_Abstracts.pdf (accessed 12.09.2018).
[23] Maracha V.G. Feedback Mechanisms in Public Administration System: System-Cybernetic and Institutional Aspects. Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniya. 2017; 4(3):132-137. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29413042 (accessed 12.09.2018). (In Russian)
[24] Bespalov S.V. Administrative Reform and Problem of Increase in Efficiency of Public Administration in Russia (Constitutional and Political and Organizational Components). Problemy formirovaniia gosudarstvennykh politik v Rossii. Moscow, Nauchnyi ekspert, 2006, pp. 151-156. (In Russian)
[25] Maracha V.G. Economics and “General Social Analysis” from the Perspective of System-Institutional Approach. System Analysis in Economics – 2016. Kleiner G.B., Shchepetova S.E. (Eds.) Vol. 1. Moscow, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 2016, pp. 339-342. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28972451 (accessed 12.09.2018). (In Russian)
[26] Auzan А.А. et al. Socio-cultural Factors of Innovative Development and Successful Implementation of Reforms. Report of the CSR. Moscow, 2017. 187 p. Available at: http://csr.ru/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Report-SF.pdf (accessed 12.09.2018). (In Russian)
[27] van den Berg L., Braun E., van Winden W. Growth Clusters in European Cities: An Integral Approach. Urban Studies. 2001; 38(1):185-205. DOI: 10.1080/00420980124001
[28] Polterovich V.M. Transplantation of Economic Institutions. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii = Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2001; 3:24-50. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9551521 (accessed 12.09.2018). (In Russian)
[29] Vygotsky L.S. Thinking and Speech. Ed. 5, rev., Moscow, Publishing house “Labyrinth”, 1999. 352 p. (In Russian)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Publication policy of the journal is based on traditional ethical principles of the Russian scientific periodicals and is built in terms of ethical norms of editors and publishers work stated in Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors and Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers, developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). In the course of publishing editorial board of the journal is led by international rules for copyright protection, statutory regulations of the Russian Federation as well as international standards of publishing.
Authors publishing articles in this journal agree to the following: They retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of the work, which is automatically licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY license). Users can use, reuse and build upon the material published in this journal provided that such uses are fully attributed.
