TYPOLOGY OF CONTEXTS AND CONTEXTUAL APPROACH PRINCIPLES IN MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
Abstract
The purpose of the article is the creation of a typology of contexts based on the comparative analysis of the concept of contexts and classification of context types in various areas of theoretical and applied knowledge that reflect the specificity of the contextual approach trends in interdisciplinary research. The specificity of the subject/interdisciplinary areas of contexts extraction should be taken into account to interpret the context knowledge. For this objective, contexts systematization of text and non-textual modality has been done. The represented typology of context knowledge, automatically extracted from distributed information environment, (depending on research objectives) may be supplemented by the types of contexts, not being extracted automatically, but which perform important functions in the development of the subject area. In substantiating the typology of contexts and contextual knowledge, the synthetic method and method of content-analysis, the principles of systemic approach and ontological approach are used. The principles of classification and functions of contexts in Computer Science, various subject areas of scientific knowledge, and in the field of communication are represented. A typology of contexts, which includes different levels of contextual knowledge interpretation on the base of multi-level structural analysis, is formed. The devised typology of contexts including different levels of contextual knowledge interpretation is tested in the pilot study analysis of the terminological base development of interdisciplinary direction ‘Digital economy: the State e-Governance and Smart Technologies’. Contextual knowledge clusters of this subject area identified with the term-concepts, allow you distinguishing thematic trends to form the conceptual model of this interdisciplinary direction, and determine the tendencies of its development. Further work involves creating a thesaurus and subject domain ontology of ‘Digital Economy’. The results of the research can be used to analyze the development of terminological databases of promising interdisciplinary research directions that has important theoretical significance for Cognitive Linguistics, Semantics, Humanitarian Informatics. The principles of the contextual approach can be used in teaching practice to achieve self-actualization by students and in the field of social communications.
References
[2] Voogt J., Fisser P., Roblin N.P., Tondeur J., van Braak J. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge – a Review of the Literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2012; 29(2):109-121. (In Eng.) DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
[3] Karpov A.O. Diskurs: klassifikacija kontekstov [Discourse: Classification of Contexts]. Voprosy Filosofii = Problems of Philosophy. 2008; 2:74-87. Availible at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=10209127 (accessed 12.02.2019). (In Russ.)
[4] Kasavin I.T. Tekst. Diskurs. Kontekst. Vvedenie v social'nuju jepistemologiju jazyka [Text. Discourse. Context. Introduction to the Social Epistemology of Language]. M.: Canon +, 2008. (In Russ.)
[5] Jakubczyc J.A., Owoc M.L. Contextual Knowledge Granularity. Proceedings of Informing Science & IT Education Conference (InSITE). 2011. p. 259-268. Availible at: http://proceedings.informingscience.org/InSITE2011/InSITE11p259-268Jakubczyc335.pdf (accessed 12.02.2019). (In Eng.)
[6] Ranaivoson H., Delaere S. Media Innovation and Business Models: the Case of Immersive Content Distribution Platforms. IADIS International Journal on WWW/Internet. 2018; 16(1):42-55. Availible at: http://www.iadisportal.org/ijwi/papers/2018161103.pdf (accessed 12.02.2019). (In Eng.)
[7] Brézillion P., Pomerol J.-Ch., Saker I. Contextual and Contextualized Knowledge in Subway Control. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 1998; 48(3):357-373. (In Eng.) DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.1997.0175
[8] Bhargava N., Sharma R. Contextualization of Geospatial Database Semantics for Mediating Human-GIS Dialogues. TECHNIA – International Journal of Computing Science and Communication Technologies. 2010; 3(1):511-523. Availible at: http://techniajournal.com/attachments/article/123/2.pdf (accessed 12.02.2019). (In Eng.)
[9] Golubkova E.V. The types of context used to manifest the meanings of ad hoc nominative units. Philology at MGIMO. 2015; 3(3):17-24. Availible at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25080071 (accessed 12.02.2019). (In Russ.)
[10] Dominikan A.I. Types of contexts according to different scientific approaches. Herald of Tver State University: Series Philology. 2017; 4:125-131. Availible at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30648290 (accessed 12.02.2019). (In Russ.)
[11] Mikeshina L.A. Filosofija poznanija. Polemicheskie glavy. [Philosophy of Knowledge. Polemical Chapters]. M.: Progress-Tradition, 2002. (In Russ.)
[12] Gavrilova T. A. , Leshcheva I.A., Kudryavcev D.V. Ispol'zovanie modelej inzhenerii znanij dlya podgotovki specialistov v oblasti informacionnyh tekhnologij [Knowledge Engineering Models for the Training of Specialists in the Field of Information Technology]. Sistemnoe programmirovanie. 2012; 7(1):90-105. Availible at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20262097 (accessed 12.02.2019). (In Russ.)
[13] Raimbault J. Exploration of an Interdisciplinary Scientific Landscape. Scientometrics. 2019; 119(2):617-641. (In Eng.) DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03090-3
[14] Lagutina N.S., Lagutina K.V., Adrianov A.S., Paramonov I.V. Russian-Language Thesauri: Automated Construction and Application for Natural Language Processing Tasks. Modeling and Analysis of Information Systems. 2018; 25(4):435-458. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18255/1818-1015-2018-4-435-458
[15] Sidorova E.A. Ontology-based approach to modeling the process of extracting information from text. Ontology of Designing. 2018; 8(1):134-151. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18287/2223-9537-2018-8-1-134-151
[16] Zagorulko Yu., Borovikova O., Bulgakov S., Sidorova E. Ontology-Based Approach to Development of Adjustable Knowledge Internet Portal for Support of Research Activity. Bulletin of the Novosibirsk Computing Center. Series: Computer Science. 2005; 23:45-56. Availible at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19401602 (accessed 12.02.2019). (In Eng.)
[17] Аndreeva О.А., Borovikova О.I., Bulgaкоv S.V., Zagorulko Yu. А., Sidorova Е.А., Kholyushkin Yu. P., Tsirkin B.G. About organization portal of knowledge on аrchaeology on a basis of оntology. Novosibirsk State University Bulletin. Series: History and Philology. 2009; 8(5):53-61. Availible at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12990280 (accessed 12.02.2019). (In Russ.)
[18] Loukachevitch N., Dobrov B. RuThes Linguistic Ontology vs. Russian Wordnets. Proceedings of the Seventh Global WordNet Conference. Tartu, 2014. р. 154-162. Availible at: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W14-0121 (accessed 12.02.2019). (In Eng.)
[19] Narinyani A.S. A Centaur by name TEON: Thesaurus + Ontology. Proceedings of the International Seminar “Dialogue-2001” on Computer Linguistics and its Applications. Vol. 1. Aksakovo, 2001. p. 184-188. Availible at: http://www.dialog-21.ru/digest/2001/articles/narinyani/ (accessed 12.02.2019). (In Russ.)
[20] Matisov S.K. Problema konteksta [Problem of Context]. Iazyk. Znanie. Socium. Problemy social'noj epistemologii [Language. Knowledge & Society. Social Epistemology] I.T. Kasavin. (ed). M.: IPh. RAS, 2007. p. 75-93. (In Russ.)
[21] Brady M., Pritchard D. Epistemological Contextualism: Problems and Prospects. The Philosophical Quarterly. 2005; 55(219):161-171. (In Eng.) DOI: 10.1111/j.0031-8094.2005.00393.x
[22] Cohen S. Contextualism Defended. In: M. Steup, J. Turri, E. Sosa (ed.). Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. 2nd ed. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014. p. 69-75. (In Eng.)
[23] Williamson T. Knowledge, Context, and the Agent's Point of View. In: G. Preyer, G. Peter (ed.) Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. p. 91-114. (In Eng.)
[24] Limby D.K., Pears R., Connor R., MacDonell S.G. Contextual and Concept-Based Interactive Query Expansion. Proceedings of the 19th Annual conference of the National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications (NACCQ). Wellington, New Zeland, NACCQ, 2006. p. 151-155. Availible at: https://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10292/1594/Limbu,%20Pears,%20Connor%20and%20MacDonell%20(2006)%20NACCQ%20SERL.pdf;sequence=2 (accessed 12.02.2019). (In Eng.)
[25] Le H., Tuzovsky A.F. Search in Semantic Digital Libraries. Proceedings of Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics. 2013; 1(27):87-94. Availible at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20160199 (accessed 12.02.2019). (In Russ.)
[26] Lyapin S.H. Izuchenie kommunikativnogo diskursa v prostranstve SMI sredstvami prodvinutogo polnotekstovogo poiska [Learning of Communicative Discourse in Mass Media Space by Means of Advanced Full Textual Search]. Strategicheskie kommunikacii v biznese i politike = Strategic Communications in Business and Politics. 2015; 1:95-99. Availible at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26707289 (accessed 12.02.2019). (In Russ.)
[27] Guha R., McCarthy J. Varieties of Сontexts. In: Blackburn P., Ghidini C., Turner R.M., Giunchiglia F. (ed.) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2003; 2680: 164-177. (In Eng.) DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44958-2_14
[28] Dorenskaya E.A., Semenov Yu.A. The Determination Method for Contextual Meanings of Words and Documents. Sovremennye informacionnye tehnologii i IT-obrazovanie = Modern Information Technologies and IT-Education. 2018; 14(4):896-902. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25559/SITITO.14.201804.896-902
[29] Kononova O.V., Lyapin S.Kh., Prokudin D.E. Studying the Interdisciplinary Terminological Landscape of Digital Economy with the Use of Contextual Analysis Tools. International Journal of Open Information Technologies. 2018; 6(12):57-66. Availible at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36541873 (accessed 12.02.2019). (In Russ.)
[30] Lyapin S.Kh., Kukovyakin A.V., Kudriavtceva M.V. The use of e-library for the explication of concept-thematic trends. Proceedings of the 19th Joint Conference “Internet and Modern Society” IMS-2016. Saint-Petersburg, 2016. p. 70-86. Availible at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27548347 (accessed 12.02.2019). (In Russ.)
[31] Van Dijk T.A. Contextual knowledge management in discourse production. A Cognitive Expansion of Discourse Practice. In: R. Wodak, P. Chilton (ed.) A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity. Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2005; 13:71-100. (In Eng.) DOI: 10.1075/dapsac.13.07dij
[32] Saif, H., He Y., Fernandez M., Alani H. Contextual semantics for sentiment analysis of Twitter. Information Processing & Management. 2015; 52(1):5-19. (In Eng.) DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2015.01.005
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Publication policy of the journal is based on traditional ethical principles of the Russian scientific periodicals and is built in terms of ethical norms of editors and publishers work stated in Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors and Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers, developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). In the course of publishing editorial board of the journal is led by international rules for copyright protection, statutory regulations of the Russian Federation as well as international standards of publishing.
Authors publishing articles in this journal agree to the following: They retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of the work, which is automatically licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY license). Users can use, reuse and build upon the material published in this journal provided that such uses are fully attributed.
