COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF OBJECTIVES OF INFORMATICS' LEARNING IN GENERAL EDUCATION
Abstract
Two triads of the goals of the general educational study of informatics dominate in different countries are compared: “ICT competence - Computer literacy - Information culture” (Russia) and “Computational Thinking - Digital Literacy - Information Literacy” (USA, Great Britain and some other countries). It is shown that for the set of components these goal triads generally correspond to each other, but differ in accentuation of the degree of importance of individual elements. In particular, this difference is manifested in the focus on “problem solving”, emphasized in the second of the above-mentioned triads, understood as a multi-stage sequence of actions to solve real problems from different areas of knowledge and daily activities, which ends with the use of computer technology. The introduction of the term “computational thinking” in conjunction with “solving problems” in an extensive network of concepts historically formed in the Russian scientific and pedagogical literature, including those devoted to school informatics, is appropriate, since this term introduces an essentially new element in the goal-setting of general education and, in particular, the study of informatics. The formation of computational thinking and stressing the importance of “solving problems”, understood in the sense that is put into these terms in the English-language pedagogical literature, will help to strengthen the formation of meta-subject results of education. Such an approach can also contribute to the formation of knowledge and skills in the field of informatics, since the use of computer technologies at the final stage of the problem-solving process is in most cases the best and most relevant at the present stage of education development by successfully solving many practically important tasks.
References
[2] Hubwieser P., Armoni M., Giannakos M.N., Mittermeir R.T. Perspectives and Visions of Computer Science Education in Primary and Secondary (K-12) Schools. ACM Transactions on Computing Education. 2014; 14(2):7.1-7, article 7. DOI: 10.1145/2602482
[3] Brown N.C.C., Sentence S., Crick N., Humphreys S. Restart: The Resurgence of Computer Science in UK Schools. ACM Transactions on Computing Education. 2014; 1(1), article 1. 22 p. DOI: 10.1145/0000000.0000000
[4] Hubwieser P.et al. A Global Snapshot of Computer Science Education in K-12 Schools. Conference Proceedings of the 2015 ITiCSE Working Group Reports (ITICSE-WGR '15). DOI: 10.1145/2858796.2858799
[5] Khenner E.K. Subject "Informatics": cross-country comparisons and development prospects. Informatics and Education. 2016; 10(279):18-26. (In Russian)
[6] Khenner E.K., Soloveva T.N. Studying of informatics in higher education institution in the conditions of the digital educational environment. Prepodavatel XXI vek. 2016; 4:42-54. (In Russian)
[7] Association of American Colleges & Universities: General Education]. Available at: https://www.aacu.org/resources/general-education (accessed 20.05.2018).
[8] Hart Research Associates. Recent Trends in General Education Design, Learning Outcomes, and Teaching Approaches. January 19, 2016. Available at: https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/2015_Survey_Report2_GEtrends.pdf (accessed 20.05.2018).
[9] Lapchik M.P. ICT competence of teachers. Omsk: Publishing house OmGPU, 2007. 144 p. (In Russian)
[10] Khenner E.K. Formation of ICT competence of students and teachers in the system of continuous education. Moscow: BINOM. Lab knowledge, 2008. 188 p. (In Russian)
[11] Pronina L.A. Information culture as a factor in the development of the information society. Analitika kul'turologii. 2008; 1(10):75-91. Available at: http://analiculturolog.ru/journal/archive/item/531-article_13-2.html (accessed 20.05.2018). (In Russian)
[12] Curry A., Moore C. Assessing information culture – an exploratory model. International Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals. 2003; 23(2):91-110. DOI: 10.1016/S0268-4012(02)00102-0
[13] Berman N.D. To the question of digital literacy. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology. 2017; 8(6)-2:35-38. DOI: 10.12731/2218-7405-2017-6-2-35-38 (In Russian)
[14] Spires H., Bartlett M. Digital literacies and learning: Designing a path forward. Friday Institute White Paper Series. NC State University. 2012. Available at: https://www.fi.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/digital-literacies-and-learning.pdf (accessed 20.05.2018).
[15] American Library Association. Report of the office for Information Technology policy’s Digital Literacy Task Force. 2013. 27 p. Available at: http://www.districtdispatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/2012_OITP_digilitreport_1_22_13.pdf (accessed 20.05.2018).
[16] American Library Association. Presidential Committee on Information Literacy. Final Report. 1989. Available at: http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential (accessed 20.05.2018).
[17] Association of College and Research Libraries American Library Association. Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Available at: http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency (accessed 20.05.2018).
[18] Hobbs R. et al. Digital Literacy in Higher Education: A Report. 2017. Providence, RI: Media Education Lab. 38 pages. Available at: https://mediaeducationlab.com/sites/default/files/Digital%20Literacy%20in%20HigherEd%202017%20final.pdf (accessed 20.05.2018).
[19] Gendina N.I. Information literacy and personal information culture: International and Russian approaches to solving the problem. Open Education. 2007; 5:58-69.
[20] Wing J. Research Notebook: Computational Thinking – What and Why? The Link. The magazine of the Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science. Available at: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/link/research-notebook-computational-thinking-what-and-why (accessed 20.05.2018).
[21] Khenner E.K. Computational thinking. The Education and science journal. 2016; (2):18-33. (In Russian) DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2016-2-18-33
[22] Computational thinking for all. Computational thinking operational definition / Computer Science Teacher Association. Available at: https://www.iste.org/explore/articleDetail?articleid=152&category=Solutions&article=Computational-thinking-for-all (accessed 20.05.2018).
[23] Curzon P., McOwan P.W. The Power of Computational Thinking. Games, Magic and Puzzles to Help You Become a Computational Thinker. World Scientific Publishing Europe Ltd., 2017. 232 p. (Russ. ed.: Kerzon P., Makouehn P. Vychislitel'noe myshlenie: Metod resheniya slozhnyh zadach. Izd-vo Al'pina Pablisher, 2018. 266 p.)
[24] Akcaoglu M. Learning problem-solving through making games at the game design and learning. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2014; 62(5):583-600. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-014-9347-4
[25] The Pisa 2003 Assessment Framework. Mathematics, Reading, Science and Problem Solving Knowledge and Skills. OECD, 2003. 200 p. Available at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/the-pisa-2003-assessment-framework_9789264101739-en (accessed 20.05.2018).
[26] K12 Computer Science Framework, 2017. Computer Science Teachers Association, the Association for Computing Machinery, and Code.org. 307 p. Available at: https://k12cs.org/ (accessed 20.05.2018).
[27] Margolis J., Jean J. Ryoo J.J., Sandoval C.D.M., Lee C., Goode J., Chapman G. Beyond Access: Broadening Participation in High School Computer Science. ACM Inroads. 2012; 3(4):72-78. DOI: 10.1145/2381083.2381102

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Publication policy of the journal is based on traditional ethical principles of the Russian scientific periodicals and is built in terms of ethical norms of editors and publishers work stated in Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors and Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers, developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). In the course of publishing editorial board of the journal is led by international rules for copyright protection, statutory regulations of the Russian Federation as well as international standards of publishing.
Authors publishing articles in this journal agree to the following: They retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of the work, which is automatically licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY license). Users can use, reuse and build upon the material published in this journal provided that such uses are fully attributed.