Metrology of Systems of Evolutionary Coordination of Decisions and Rationing of Intellectual Work
Abstract
The work outlines a new information technology for evolutionary coordination of decisions for organizing effective group work. The coordination of group work is carried out in a self-organizing way through the use of genetic algorithms. The use of the Rush model and the principle of equal pay for equal work made it possible to introduce a universal unit for measuring the intellectual complexity of a task and the intellectual strength of actors - INT and to find the dependence of these quantities on the model parameters. A technique is proposed for objectively measuring the creative abilities of actors and determining the integral assessment of the quality of the actor’s work, as well as the relative values of the cost of solving problems and remuneration. The optimal number of actors was found to provide a cost-effective solution to the problem.
References
[2] Nilsson N.J. Principles of Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1982. (In Eng.)
[3] Orlov A.I. Optimization Problems and Fuzzy Variables. Znanie , Moscow , 1980.
[4] Andreenkov V.G., Orlov A.I., Tolstova Yu.N. (Eds.) Analiz nechislovoj informacii v sociologicheskih issledovaniyah [Analysis of Non-Numerical Information in Sociologic Investigations]. Nauka, Moscow, 1985, pp. 58-92. Available at:
[5] Orlovsky S.A. Problemy prinyatiya reshenij pri nechetkoj iskhodnoj informacii [Problems of Decision Making with Fuzzy Information]. Nauka , Moscow , 1981. ( )
[6] Osipov G.S. Sociology: Problems of Theory and Method. University Press of the Pacific Paperback, 2001. (In Eng.)
[7] Osipov G.S. Construction of domain models. Part I. Heterogeneous semantic networks // Izv. AN SSSR, Tekhn. Kibern. 1990; (5):32-45. Available at:
[8] Lomov B.F. (ed.) Problems of Engineering Psychology. NASA, Washington, D.C., 1965. (In Eng.)
[9] Podinovski V.V., Gavrilov V.M. Optimizaciya po posledovatel'no primenyaemym kriteriyam [Optimization According to Criteria Applied Successively]. Sovetskoe Radio , Moscow , 1975. (
[10] Podinovski V.V. On the Relative Importance of Criteria. In: Gvishiani D.M., Emel’yanov S.V. Mulicriteria Decision Making. Mashinostroenie, Moscow, 1978. (In Russ.)
[11] Podinovski V.V. Criterion importance coefficients in decision-making problems ordinal coefficients. Automation and Remote Control . 1979 ; 39 ): 1514 - 1524 . (In Eng.)
[12] Protasov V.I., Karelin V.P. A new method for the collective development of projects in computer networks. University News. North-Caucasian Region. Technical Sciences Series. 2002; (2):27-30. (In Russ.)
[13] Protasov V.I. Opredelenie mery trudnosti zadanij i urovnya podgotovlennosti ekspertov pri ispol'zovanii metoda evolyucionnogo soglasovaniya reshenij [Determining the measure of difficulty of tasks and the level of preparedness of experts when using the method of evolutionary coordination of decisions]. Pedagogicheskie izmereniya . 2015; (2):34-46. (In Russ.)
[14] Protasov V.I. Konstruirovanie metasistemnyh perekhodov v intellektual'nyh sistemah [Construction of metasystem transitions in intelligent systems]. ICPT, Moscow,
[15] Protasov V.I., Potapova Z.E., Osipchuk O.K. Sertifikaciya ekspertov i opredelenie otnositel'noj ceny zadachi v zavisimosti ot ee slozhnosti [Certification of experts and determination of the relative price of a task depending on its complexity]. In: Information and mathematical technologies in science and management. Proceedings, vol. 2. ISEM SB RAS, Irkutsk, 2015, pp. 164-176. Available at: ( In Russ .)
[16] Protasov V.I. Network method of evolutionary agreed solutions and its application in project management. The Project Management Journal. 2011; (1):22-35. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15706732
[17] Saaty T.L. Decision making – the Analytic Hierarchy and Network Processes (AHP/ANP). Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering. 2004; 13(1):1-35. (In Eng.) DOI: 10.1007/s11518-006-0151-5
[18] Segaran T. Programming Collective Intelligence. Building Smart Web 2.0 Applications. O’Reilly Media, 2007. (In Eng.)
[19] Condorcet Jean Antoine Nicolas de Caritat Essai sur l’application de l’analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix. Par m. le marquis de Condorcet. Paris: Imprimerie Royale, 1785. (In French)
[20] Veltman K.H. Computers and a New Philosophy of Knowledge. International Classification. 1991; 18:2-12. Available at: http://www.sumscorp.com/img/file/1991_Computers_and_a_New_Philosophy_of_Knowledge.pdf (accessed 23.08.2019). (In Eng.)
[21] Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy algorithms. Information and Control. 1968; 12(2):94-102. (In Eng.) DOI: 10.1016/S0019-9958(68)90211-8
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Publication policy of the journal is based on traditional ethical principles of the Russian scientific periodicals and is built in terms of ethical norms of editors and publishers work stated in Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors and Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers, developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). In the course of publishing editorial board of the journal is led by international rules for copyright protection, statutory regulations of the Russian Federation as well as international standards of publishing.
Authors publishing articles in this journal agree to the following: They retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of the work, which is automatically licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY license). Users can use, reuse and build upon the material published in this journal provided that such uses are fully attributed.
