Problems of Applying the Fund of Assessment Tools to Check the Formation of Competencies in the Process of Diagnostic Work
Abstract
Improving the quality of education refers to the most significant issues of increasing the competitiveness of educational programs, and therefore to increase the attractiveness of educational organizations in the eyes of applicants. As measures for quality control in universities, diagnostic work in the form of online (remote) testing of students is carried out. Despite the existence of a large number of test issues and the experience of such measures, new tasks arise to verify the formation of competencies, requiring an interdisciplinary approach to the formation of funds of appraisal funds and tests. Due to the fact that several disciplines and practices can participate in the formation of one competence, and one discipline can participate in the formation of several competencies, it is required to direct efforts to the structure of the fund of appraisal tools that are most relevant to the solution of pedagogical problems (training, training, control, diagnosis and diagnostics etc.). The work provides the results of studying the possibility of applying existing resources of funds of appraisal funds for an internal independent assessment of the quality of educational activities and training university students, taking into account accreditation indicators during diagnostic work. The work considers the approach to the formation of test options for diagnostic control tasks. Some problems related to the testing procedure for funds of appraisal funds of external educational organizations and their own bank of test tasks were identified, and therefore, the task of forming students' skills to carry out test control during diagnostic work remains relevant. A number of recommendations have been made to further improve the learning achievement fund (tasks of diagnostic control of the minimum level, the task of diagnostic control of the average level of mastering the educational material, the task of diagnostic control of a high level of mastering the educational material), the learning criteria should be developed by a team of subject teachers. As a recommendation for the further development of the fund of assessment tools, the need for various forms of submission of test items was noted, which affects the differentiating ability of tests to identify strong and weak students in mathematical, programming and information disciplines.
References
2. Kuzenkov O.A., Grezina A.V., Shestakova N.V., Karpenko S.N. Opyt razrabotki obrazovatel nyh standartov (v sootvetstvii s FGOS 3 ++) [Experience in the development of educational standards (in accordance with the Federal State Educational Standards 3 ++)]. Educational Technology & Society. 2020;23(1):159-169. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41828165 (accessed 03.12.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
3. Kuzenkov O.A., Zakharova I.V. Competencies of Digital Culture in Mathematics Education and their Formation. Modern Information Technologies and IT-Education. 2021;17(2):379-391. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.25559/SITITO.17.202102.379-391
4. Shcherbakov N.P. Internal assessment of the quality of training of students. In: Motova G. N. (Ed.) New technologies of education quality assessment: materials of XVI Forum of the Guild of Experts. .: Guild of Experts in the Sphere of Professional Education; 2021. p. 135-141. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45749561 (accessed 03.12.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Temnov E.S., Potapov S.A., Morzhov A.V., Rannih V.N. Analysis of the implementation of activities in the educational institutions of higher education internal evaluation of the quality of education. News of the Tula state university. Pedagogics. 2018;(3):116-124. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36276999 (accessed 03.12.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Ovsyannikova D.D., Volkova T.A. Analysis of existing approaches to internal independent assessment of the quality of educational activities by students of educational organizations. In: Stolyarova O.A. (ed.) Problemy upravlenija kachestvom obrazovanija = Problems of education quality management. Penza: Penza SAU; 2020. p. 111-116. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44682179 (accessed 03.12.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
7. Kiryukhina N.V., Gorbunov A.K., Kritskaya A.R. On the design principles of measuring materials for the residual knowledge control in physics at the university. Jelektronnyj zhurnal: Nauka, tehnika i obrazovanie. 2017;(2):279-289. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29381592 (accessed 03.12.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Kozhukhova N.Yu., Kozhukhova A.N. Development of the Fund of Assessment Tools in the Conditions of Federal State Educational Standards Realization. Bulletin of the Bryansk Agricultural Academy. 2017;(6):60-64. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30647957 (accessed 03.12.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
9. Borovkov A.I., Kiseleva K.N., Romanov P.I. The Normative Legal and Methodological Bases of Formation of Fund Assets Valuation of the Basic Educational Programs of Higher Education. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2016;(2):131-139. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.5862/JHSS.244.16
10. Baykina E.A. Types and structure of evaluation funds in the context of implementation of modular educational programs of the university. The Bulletin of Adyghe State University: Internet Scientific Journal. 2019;(4):15-22. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41863322 (accessed 03.12.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
11. Kasyuk S.T. The theory and practice of creating an evaluation tools for information technology courses at university. In: Sharonova V.B. (ed.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Profile and Vocational Education in Conditions of Modern Polycultural Space. Chelyabinsk: RANEPA, Chelyabinsk Branch; 2016. p. 113-119. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28177287 (accessed 03.12.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
12. Kunts E.Yu., Poletaykin A.N. Digitalization of Rating Tools Fund. In: Proceedings of the VI all-Russian scientific and technical conference on Digital economy. New time New technologies. ROSINFOCOM 2020. Samara: PSUTI; 2020. p. 102-103. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44620043 (accessed 03.12.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
13. Kuzenkov O.A., Kuzenkova G.V., Biryukov R.S. Development of a fund of evaluation tools using the MathBridge package. Educational Technology & Society. 2016;19(4):465-478. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27163069 (accessed 03.12.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
14. Shestakova N.V., Kuzenkova G.V., Karpenko S.N., Borisov N.A., Labutin D.Yu. The system of electronic testing in the complex of forms for the implementation of the fund of evaluation funds. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovative teaching methods in higher education. Nizhny Novgorod: University of Nizhny Novgorod; 2016. p. 279-284. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27304499 (accessed 03.12.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
15. Karpenko S.N., Kuzenkova G.V., Shestakova N.V., Borisov N.A., Kuznetsov A.I. The creation of an electronic testing system on the basis of LMS Moodle as part of the foundation assessment tools. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 2016;1761:151-157. Available at: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1761/paper19.pdf (accessed 03.12.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
16. Schmid M., Brianza E., Petko D. Developing a short assessment instrument for Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK.xs) and comparing the factor structure of an integrative and a transformative model. Computers & Education. 2020;157:103967. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103967
17. Sviridov V.V., Chudinskiy R.M., Kochukova M.V. Pedagogical model for controlling students 'residual knowledge in natural sciences. Modern problems of science and education. 2021;(1):31. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17513/spno.30524
18. Nesterov Yu.A., Kurolap S.A., Baskakova A.G. Organization of diagnostic work to check the residual knowledge of students. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Geography. Geoecology. 2022;(2):128-136. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.17308/ geo.2022.2/9319
19. Grezina A.V., Panasenko A.G. Use of modern technologies in teaching physics during education of buchelors. Modern Information Technologies and IT-Education. 2018;14(1):293-303. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) doi: https://doi.org/10.25559/SITITO.14.201801.293-303
20. Kuzenkova G.V. The experience of applying the on-line course "Designing the Human-Machine Interface" in the process of training management. Educational Technology & Society. 2019;22(4):154-161. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41233711 (accessed 03.12.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
21. Kuzenkov O.A., Kostromina O.S. The use of educational electronic tools to verify the achievement of the minimum level of mastering the discipline "Mathematical analysis". Educational Technology & Society. 2019;22(4):131-142. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41233709 (accessed 03.12.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
22. Kuzenkov O.A., Kuzenkova G.V., Kiseleva T.P. The use of educational electronic tools for the modernization of the discipline program "Mathematical modeling selection processes". Educational Technology & Society. 2018;21(1):435-448. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32253185 (accessed 03.12.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
23. Kuzenkov O.A., Kuzenkova G.V., Kiseleva T.P. Computer support for educational and research projects in the field of mathematical modeling of selection processes. Educational Technology & Society. 2019;22(1):152-163. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37037790 (accessed 03.12.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
24. Nesterov S.A., Nikolskaya A.N. Analysis of Quality of Quiz Tasks in LMS Moodle. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on System Analysis in Engineering and Control (SAEC-2021). Part 2. St.Petersburg: SPbPU; 2018. p. 383-387. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35279123 (accessed 03.12.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
25. Dyatlova K.D., Gavrilova M.A., Kolpakov I.A. The experience of developing a final competency test. Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod. 2013;(2-1):11-15. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19066893 (accessed 03.12.2022). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Publication policy of the journal is based on traditional ethical principles of the Russian scientific periodicals and is built in terms of ethical norms of editors and publishers work stated in Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors and Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers, developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). In the course of publishing editorial board of the journal is led by international rules for copyright protection, statutory regulations of the Russian Federation as well as international standards of publishing.
Authors publishing articles in this journal agree to the following: They retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication of the work, which is automatically licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY license). Users can use, reuse and build upon the material published in this journal provided that such uses are fully attributed.
