On Predicting Learning Outcomes Based on Fuzzy Modeling

Abstract

When teaching schoolchildren or students, regardless of the discipline being studied, it is highly desirable to predict the knowledge of students. At the same time, one of the possible factors on the basis of which forecasting is based may be the knowledge of students in previously studied sections of this discipline. The constructed forecast can allow for a more effective individual approach to students, improve the quality of the learning process.
Since all sections of almost any training course are interconnected, it is possible to build a graph that models the structure of connections within the entire discipline or any part of it. Due to the fact that the connections between the sections of the discipline have different degrees of significance, and the definition of this significance is subjective, it is advisable to use a fuzzy graph for modeling, the degrees of belonging of the arcs of which model the closeness of the connection between the sections of the discipline within the framework of the model under consideration. Based on the constructed fuzzy graph, it is possible to build a fuzzy inference system that allows you to predict the results of educational activities in the discipline. It is obvious that the construction of a model in each specific case should be carried out jointly by a teacher or a specialist in the methodology of teaching this discipline and a specialist in the field of fuzzy modeling.
The paper considers an example of constructing a fuzzy graph and a system of rules for predicting the results of training in the algebra course of the 7th grade of high school and a computer implementation of the constructed model using the Fuzzy Logic Toolbox library of the MatLab package and a C# software application developed by us using the Accord library. The comparison of these two approaches to the implementation of the model is carried out.

Author Biography

Vladimir Romanovich Kristalinskii, Smolensk State University

Associate Professor of the Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Physics and Mathematics, Ph.D. (Phys.-Math.), Associate Professor

References

1. Apatova N.V., Gaponov A.I., Mayorova A.N. Prediction of student performance based on fuzzy logic. Modern high technologies. 2017; (4):7-11. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29117410 (accessed 17.03.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
2. Kristalinskii V.R., Belousov V.V. Prognozirovanie rezul'tatov obucheniya na osnove nechetkogo i haoticheskogo modelirovaniya [Prediction of learning outcomes based on fuzzy and chaotic modeling]. Sovremennye informacionnye tehnologii i IT-obrazovanie = Modern Information Technologies and IT-Education. 2012; (8):680-684. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23020451 (accessed 17.03.2021). (In Russ.)
3. Kristalinskii V.R. Ispol'zovanie sistem nechetkogo vyvoda v prognozirovanii rezul'tatov obucheniya [Using fuzzy inference systems in predicting learning outcomes]. Sistemy komp’yuternoj matematiki i ih prilozheniya = Computer Mathematics Systems and Their Applications. 2011; (12):295-297. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44691416 (accessed 17.03.2021). (In Russ.)
4. Boyarinov D.A. The method of consecutive approach to the specified purposes of education within the limits of informational educational space of students' personal development. World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology. 2014; (4):1. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23581557 (accessed 17.03.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
5. Grushevsky S.P. Training and information center as a new means of teaching mathematics at the present stage of development of education. Herzen University, SPb; 2001. 142 p. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23326543 (accessed 17.03.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
6. Leonenkoff A.V. Nechetkoe modelirovanie v srede MATLAB i fuzzyTECH [Fuzzy Simulation in MATLAB and fuzzyTech]. BHV-Peterburg, SPb; 2005. 736 p. (In Russ.)
7. Lukyanenko T.V., Shcheblykin A.G. Prediction of learning outcomes academic group. Colloquium-journal. 2018; (2-1):34-35. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32706513 (accessed 17.03.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
8. Tashkinov Ju.A. Pedagogical forecasting of educational results of future civil engineers in real time. Personality in a changing world: health, adaptation, development. 2020; 8(1):35-45. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.23888/humJ2020135-45
9. Tashkinov Ju.A. Forecasting Construction Engineering Students’ Learning Outcomes by Means of Computational Pedagogys. Integratsiya obrazovaniya = Integration of Education. 2020; 24(3):483-500. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.100.024.202003.483-500
10. Kustitskaya T.A. Predicting students' success in learning using Bayesian network. In: Ed. by M. V. Noskov. Proceedings of the International Conference on Informatization of Education and E-learning Methodology. Krasnoyarsk, SFU; 2019. p. 257-262. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=40646430 (accessed 17.03.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
11. Krajewski O.V., Mikhailova A.I. Pedagogical forecasting of course (discipline) mastering. Vocational Education and Labour Market. 2019; (2):41-48. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/2307-4264-2019-10207
12. Borisova L.V., Dimitrova L.A., Nurutdinova I.N. Methods of evaluating maturity level of the organization based on fuzzy modeling. Vestnik of Don State Technical University. 2017; 17(1):113-121. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.23947/1992-5980-2017-17-1-113-121
13. Dolganov D.N. Model assessment and prediction of academic success. Journal of experimental education. 2018; (1):40-54. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32672530 (accessed 17.03.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
14. Ayusheeva N.N. Fuzzy modeling of automated control systems. In: Ed. by L. A. Bokhoeva. Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and Science. BSU, Ulan-Ude; 2020. p. 219-228. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.18101/978-5-9793-1496-9-219-228
15. Saidova Z.A., Zubairov I.H. Decision-making based on fuzzy modeling of a complex system. Natural and Technical Sciences. 2021; (5):212-215. (In Russ., abstract in Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.25633/ETN.2021.05.14
16. Sakharova L.V., Arapova E.A., Alekseychik T.V., Bogachyov T.V. Assessment of state of atmosphere in region using fuzzy modeling. Vestnik of Rostov State Economic University (RINH). 2018; (3):152-159. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36527857 (accessed 17.03.2021). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.)
17. Tang H.-W.V., Yin M.-S. Forecasting performance of grey prediction for education expenditure and school enrollment. Economics of Education Review. 2012; 31(4):452-462. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.12.007
18. Bousnguar H., Najdi L., Battou A. Forecasting approaches in a higher education setting. Education and Information Technologies. 2022; 27(2):1993-2011. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10684-z
19. Beilin I.L., Khomenko V.V. Theoretical bases of project management in conditions of innovative economy based on fuzzy modeling. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018; 1015(3):032013. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/1010.1088/1742-6596/1015/3/032013
20. Khan A., Kumar S. T-S fuzzy modeling and predictive control and synchronization of chaotic satellite systems. International Journal of Modelling and Simulation. 2019; 39(3):203-213. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02286203.2018.1563393
21. Castillo O., Melin P. Forecasting of COVID-19 time series for countries in the world based on a hybrid approach combining the fractal dimension and fuzzy logic. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. 2020; 140:110242. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110242
22. Ivanov M. et al. Fuzzy modeling in human resource management. E3S Web of Conferences. 2020; 166:13010. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016613010
23. Maitra S., Madan S., Mahajan P. An Adaptive Neural Fuzzy Inference System for prediction of student performance in Higher Education. 2018 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking (ICACCCN). IEEE Press, Greater Noida, India; 2018. p. 1158-1163. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCCN.2018.8748869
24. Minzhi L., Qi S. Study on Fuzzy Evaluation of the Quality of MOOC Teaching Based on AHP. 2018 13th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE). IEEE Press, Colombo, Sri Lanka; 2018. p. 1-4. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSE.2018.8468850
25. Markova S.M., Tsyplakova S.A., Sedykh C.P., Khizhnaya A.V., Filatova O.N. Forecasting the Development of Professional Education. In: Ed. by E. G. Popkova, B. S. Sergi. The 21st Century from the Positions of Modern Science: Intellectual, Digital and Innovative Aspects. ISC 2019. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. 2020; 91:452-459. Springer, Cham. (In Eng.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32015-7_51
Published
2021-06-30
How to Cite
KRISTALINSKII, Vladimir Romanovich. On Predicting Learning Outcomes Based on Fuzzy Modeling. Modern Information Technologies and IT-Education, [S.l.], v. 17, n. 2, p. 453-463, june 2021. ISSN 2411-1473. Available at: <http://sitito.cs.msu.ru/index.php/SITITO/article/view/766>. Date accessed: 13 june 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.25559/SITITO.17.202102.453-463.
Section
Scientific software in education and science